#TORCHLIGHT 2 VS TORCHLIGHT 3 OFFLINE#I already put forth two very good reasons why D3 doesn't support an offline mode: Blizzard wants to control cheating / hacking in order to preserve the intrigue of the item pool, but they also want to make sure the gold and Real money auction houses remain legit. was launched at retail of Diablo, which is one major reason to argue that Diablo, in the minds of blizzard, was always meant to be a multiplayer game. And claiming Australia is remote, it may not be the biggest single market on the planet, but if you lump it in with other countries where high speed internet is neither affordable or prevalent Blizzard appears to be cutting off their nose to spite their face.ī was most certainly not an addition to D2. Theer is no reason D3 could not support an offlien mode as D2 did. Offline D2 was the entire game, was the addition. That's not necessarily "for free", but it certainly is without any kind of subscription or extra fee. They're also the ones making all the forum posts.Īnd I agree with the poster above-if you're going to sell your game in a territory and that game has not just an always-online requirement but is also heavily latency-dependent, then you damn well better provide local servers and you damn well better pay for it out of the purchase price of the game. The folks min-maxing their characters and making high-speed Baal runs are a minority. The casual players that make up the vast majority of the purchasers don't play online they are people like my dad, who's sunk probably north of a thousand hours into D2 over the past decade and still plays it a little bit every week. I think you're overestimating the percentage of people who played offline in D2 because you're self-selecting. When you force people to play online? Yeah, I do. Responding to your rhetorical, but emphasized question. Yeah, D2 probably sucked for you, but do you honestly expect a game company to launch servers AROUND the world for everyone to play with as little lag as possible without some form of subscription fee? At least 2.0 is partially addressing this, but if you live remote, you should expect such issues. I sympathize with Australian players, but only so much. It might be fine if you're in the US with sub 30ms pings, but Australia gets at best 250ms pings to servers. The always online does the unforgivable and introduces lag and server queues to a single player game. As an Australian almost no one used for Diablo 2. I'm suspect of your statemnet that those who didn't use as a very small minority. Hell, I purposely maxed two characters on each US realm, would play in a private game, just so I could maintain access to that trading community. D2 lasted as long as it did because of the D2JSP trading community. Yeah, they could have gone the route of not allowing offline characters to be transferred to, but those characters would have been a very small percentage of the playing population, and they would have also had to deny them access to both auction houses. It was added to control and keep cheaters to a minimum and to emphasize the legitimacy of the auction houses. I really wish people would get over thinking the 'always-connected' aspect was added to enforce DRM.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |